Please note: The authoritative / observational content of
this blog is not my own. Content has been sourced from multiple published
papers; the sources of which are broadly acknowledged.
There was some excitement in South Africa's Mpumalanga
province recently with the discovery of a 'Lesser Black-backed' - type gull at Mkhombo
Dam. Initially identified and locally verified as a vagrant Lesser Black-backed
Gull [Larus fuscus], the record, in that context, was good enough to
encourage some local interest. Subsequent questions about the validity of the
identification were raised informally in the social forum. The idea that this gull
was, in fact, a Caspian Gull [Larus
cachinnans]; South Africa's first, was proposed for discussion.
Consensus, as it turns out, largely reliant on the knowledge
of experts in the candidate-gulls’ respective Northern Hemisphere home-ranges,
proved otherwise. By process of elimination, both on form & structure
[non-authoritative] and on 'classic' or 'typical' moult-criteria, the vagrant was
deemed to be Larus (fuscus) heuglini, treated as a full
species elsewhere but only as a subspecies of the lesser black-backed gull complex
in South Africa.
The ensuing online discussion highlighted a number of pertinent
points:
- There
is insufficient data to accurately describe, split or lump the lesser
black-backed gull complex with any authority.
- There
is very little understanding of the identification-criteria migrant gulls’
exhibit on their wintering grounds, particularly in the case of long-distance migrants
and there is even less authoritative literature on the
field-characteristics for the accurate identification of 'stay-over' / seasonally-vagrant
gulls, typically out-of-range.
Before we look at the specifics of the Mkhombo gull, a bird in its second year, one or two points on the 'large white-headed gull' complex for context and a synopsis of the basic identification criteria for 2cy gulls in general.[2cy or 2nd calendar year is the year, commencing January 1, post hatching]
Mitochondrial DNA sequences show that the large white-headed
gull complex consists of two clades:
- the
"Aralo-Caspian' clade including
inter alia Larus cachinnans, L.barabensis, L.(fuscus)
heuglini, Lesser Black-backed Gull - L.fuscus.ssp.
and Kelp Gull L.dominicanus; and
- the
'Atlantic' clade which includes
most individuals of Herring Gull ie: Larus argentatus.
The taxonomy, however, remains confused.
Until recently it was common practice to subdivide 'Lesser
Black-backed Gulls' into five subspecies (ssp.), premised mostly on
geographical distribution -
- Larus
f. fuscus - western Kola Peninsula [North Arctic]
- Larus
f.graellsii - NW Spain, Netherlands
- Larus
f.intermedius - Netherlands, Germany
- Larus
f.heuglini - Kola Peninsula
- Larus
f.barabensis - Asian Steppes
Recent publications, however, describe and note the classification of 'lesser black-backed gulls' [ie: NW
dark-mantled gulls] into three species and they are: -
- Lesser
Black-backed Gull [Larus graellsii incl. intermedius]
- Baltic
Gull [Larus fuscus]
- Tundra
/ Siberian or Heuglin's Gull [Larus heuglini]
Notwithstanding, on the basis of gene-flow scrutiny no
differentiation has been found between any of the graellsii and intermedius populations.
There is no evidence purporting a significant reproductive barrier
between fuscus, graellsii and intermedius. Fuscus and heuglini,
however, indicate
some reproductive isolation even though there is evidence of continuing low
levels of gene flow in spite of the apparent ecological separation of Larus
fuscus fuscus and heuglini within the narrow contact
zone. Extensive sharing of haplotypes, between these two taxa, may simply reflect
the recent split from a shared ancestor [ie: ancestral polymorphism] rather
than gene flow.
Northern Hemisphere authorities, however, adopted
[subsequently reversed by the CSNA
given the gene flow betw. fuscus, graellsii and intermedius]
the proposed split of Lesser Black-backed Gull as follows:
- Lesser
Black-backed Gull [Larus graellsii and intermedius]
- Baltic
Gull [Larus fuscus]
- Siberian
Gull [Larus heuglini]
In South Africa the earliest classification of Lesser
Black-backed Gull remains the status quo [ie: L.f.ssp incl. L.f.heuglini].
Why that is remains a mystery.
The distribution of wintering Larus fuscus.ssp.
is little understood. Early literature split the migratory distribution of Larus
fuscus as follows:
- Larus
f.fuscus - East Africa [ie: east of the Rift Valley and the
eastern seaboard]
- Larus
f.graellsii and intermedius - predominantly West
Africa and the western seaboard, southwards to Namibia.
In a recent study ring-recoveries of some 300 individuals of
ssp. Fuscus, in Africa, concluded differently:
- Whilst
the Rift-Valley lakes are important for wintering Larus.f.fuscus
most recoveries for this ssp. were from west of the Rift Valley and into
the Congo Basin; and even further westwards to the west coast of
Africa.
- L.f.graellsii and intermedius recoveries
were concentrated on the west coast of Africa.
There is evidence, therefore, to support the idea that the
majority of Larus (f).fuscus [Baltic Gull] use the Eastern
Flyway, on their winter-migration, whilst both Larus (f).graellsii and L.f.intermedius [ie:
Lesser Black-backed Gull] use the Western Flyway.
Neither graellsii nor intermedius were
ever recovered south of the equator. Given the prevalence of Larus f.fuscus [ie:
'Leapfrog migration'] south of the equator, 'Lesser Black-backed Gull'
[or more accurately, Larus fuscus ie: Baltic Gull] may be more
common in South Africa than is generally accepted.
The situation on Africa’s eastern seaboard remains unclear,
however. The presence of a fourth taxon - Larus (fuscus) heuglini
ie: Heuglin's / Siberian / Tundra Gull may be prevalent.
L.(fuscus) heuglini breeds in Arctic Russia and was
thought to comprise of two forms: heuglini in the west; and taimyrensis in
the east. It has subsequently been 'confirmed' that taimyrensis has
no taxonomic validity. In addition Heuglini is, genetically at
least, more worthy of species status than fuscus but the taxonomy
remains unclear.
Given the complexity of the large white-headed gull complex,
MOULT is relied on to support identification. There are, however, four important caveats:
- Birds
ringed as pulli, on the breeding grounds, are often misidentified given
the geographical overlap of the ssp.
- The
identification criteria, in most published literature, is very
time-specific - MANY of the features described for birds in the boreal [N.
Hemisphere] summer do NOT hold true during the austral [S. Hemisphere]
winter; esp. for vagrants.
- Gulls
are notoriously variable and rarely conform to ‘typical’ moult timing.
Stress, injuries or poor condition can delay moult.
- It
is not uncommon for out-of-range
birds to moult in a manner consistent with the moult-cycle of taxon / taxa
present in that location. Vagrant Lesser Black-backed Gulls, in North America, regularly show moult-events consistent with the moult-cycles of local taxa.
The current view* on the identification of out-of-range [excl.
the S. Hemisphere] 2nd CY fuscus, heuglini and cachinnans is as
follows: [*based on many field-observations of 2nd CY birds; on the
breeding grounds, in the boreal summer ie: June - Aug]
- Any 2cy
LBBG-type gull with fresh primaries / tail and a combination of worn brown
and blackish upperparts is reliably fuscus.
- Some heuglini individuals are
indistinguishable from graellsii and intermedius.
- There
is no [critical] comparative analysis of 1st cy heuglini and fuscus
or for 3rd- 4th cy heuglini.
- Fuscus and heuglini
show significant variations in moult-timing and moult extent.
- 2nd
cy heuglini are often
indistinguishable from same aged cachinnans
[Caspian Gull] both in colouration and structure.
- The following criteria, however, have been mooted to reliably separate 2cy heuglini from 2cy cachinnans:
- heuglini show
dark inner primaries, dark under-wing coverts, a broader tail-band and
fresh rectrices. Cachinnans does not.
- heuglini is
comparatively smaller than cachinanns.
- cachinanns shows
more juvenile wing-coverts; with extensive wear.
- adult
scapulars appear in heuglini at the start of the boreal
summer - in cachinnans this is thought to occur later in
the year.
Despite assertions to the contrary, there is very little
empirical evidence, premised on comparative analysis, to reliably exclude one
ssp. in favour of another particularly from photographic evidence only. That
applies to gulls on their wintering grounds generally and perhaps, more
implicitly, in the case of vagrant gulls specifically.






Super blog, Mark!
ReplyDeleteTks Dirk and thank you for the 'loan' of your pic.
ReplyDelete